Thromb Haemost 1986; 55(01): 108-111
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1661458
Original Article
Schattauer GmbH Stuttgart

Comparative Study of Intranasal, Subcutaneous and Intravenous Administration of Desamino-D-Arginine Vasopressin (DDAVP)

M Köhler
The Abteilung für klinische Haemostaseologie und Transfusionsmedizin, Universität des Saarlandes, Flomburg/Saar, FRG
,
P Hellstern
The Abteilung für klinische Haemostaseologie und Transfusionsmedizin, Universität des Saarlandes, Flomburg/Saar, FRG
,
C Miyashita
The Abteilung für klinische Haemostaseologie und Transfusionsmedizin, Universität des Saarlandes, Flomburg/Saar, FRG
,
G von Blohn
The Abteilung für klinische Haemostaseologie und Transfusionsmedizin, Universität des Saarlandes, Flomburg/Saar, FRG
,
E Wenzel
The Abteilung für klinische Haemostaseologie und Transfusionsmedizin, Universität des Saarlandes, Flomburg/Saar, FRG
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Received 26. August 1985

Accepted 14. November 1985

Publikationsdatum:
21. August 2018 (online)

Preview

Summary

This study was performed to evaluate the influence of different routes of administration on the efficacy of DDAVP treatment. Ten healthy volunteers received DDAVP intranasally (i.n.), subcutaneously (s.c.) and intravenously (i.v.) in a randomized cross-over trial. Factor XII and high molecular weight (HMW)-kininogen levels increased only slightly after DDAVP administration. The mean increase of factor VIII: C was 3.1 (i. v.), 2.3 (s. c.), and 1.3 (i.n.) - fold over baseline. Ristocetin cofactor (von Willebrand factor antigen) increased 3.1 (2.5), 2.0 (2.3) and 1.2 (1.2) - fold over baseline mean values after i.v., s.c. and i.n. DDAVP, respectively. The half-disappearance time of factor VIII and von Willebrand factor (vWF) after DDAVP ranged from five (factor VIII: C) to eight hours (vWF). The mean increase of fibrinolytic activity was more pronounced after i.v. DDAVP. The antidiuretic effect was moderate with no apparent differences between the routes of application. This study provides further evidence that both i.v. and s.c. DDAVP administration result in an appropriate and reliable stimulation of haemostasis. An additional advantage of s. c. administration is its suitability for home treatment.